Discussion:
Safety First Article (#626) and the challenge to Trainers

Thanks to Bob Vetter for "vetting" an important issue in the Safety First column" "Medical Fitness is not something you can (or should) evaluate: Tuesday, 23 Jul 2013 ( #626 ).

In the USA, there are laws intended to protect operators from unfair employment practices. Mr. Vetter describes a vantage point that is both useful and proper for trainer/evaluators to adopt and apply. Perform as Mr. Vetter states in the article and you will never be criticized for performing your operator evaluation in a way that is unfair to a person with an apparent or perceived medical condition that you personally do not have or want.

Assuming that your evaluation is based in valid and objective evidence of operator behavior required on-the-job, you will do well and good to stick with the objective measures and ignore any actual or perceived medical conditions (EXCEPT for OBVIOUS and rare conditions such as a pregnant women who might have to be evaluated on how to activate the emergency reverse of a motorized hand truck by pushing her torso or hip against the large button at the end of the tiller; or the person who arrives for their evaluation with profuse bleeding. You gotta use your head on the obvious and thankfully, rare, exceptions!).

However concise and well done Mr. Vetter's writing on Medical conditions during evaluation, this begs a discussion on operator evaluation, the quality of them, and whether the normal practices in the field are helping or hindering the safety and productivity of operators on-the-job. Are the actual practices simply a pretense for regulatory compliance?

In the USA, the OSHA-required operator evaluation, as written into the regulations at 29 CFR 1910. 178 (l), is sufficiently abstract enough to allow an employer to determine the thoroughness and precision by which the evaluation is conducted. Few perform evaluations that have been validated in accord with existing professional standards. Most evaluate the operator in mostly a subjective way, with little-to-NO objective criteria; relying on "forklift instructors" whose "evaluation" methods, when examined closely, offer employers a promise of compliance that often delivers little-to-no actual substance. Consider the wide spread use of pencil and paper tests and quizzes that take up more than 90% of the evaluation time. EVERYONE knows these are virtually useless for making inferences about anyone's ability to actually operate his or her truck. To be fair to instructor/evaluators, their employers and first-line supervisors are frequently oblivious to the problems this can engender, and simply do NOT want to finance the real stuff. And the band named "pretense" played on!)

Sadly, it is NOT the strong suit of most forklift operator employers, trainers or evaluators in our field to construct an evaluation, also known as a test, that is objective, valid, reliable and precise enough to measure the actual ability of one to OPERATE the truck safely in their workplace...OPERATE being the important word, here! THAT is what is required by the OSHA standard. THAT is what employers really want. It is also what the operators want! Few, though, want to act on the required commitment of resources!

So, I think it is a challenge to all operator trainers to keep the pretense to a minimum, or to eliminate it altogether. I DON'T think this is possible without employers who will cooperate in an effort to improve evaluations beyond "let's all vote that we are now in compliance"! To improve upon the ever-important evaluation, we need to "construct" and perform the evaluations on a set of applicable principles; principles of fairness, objective criteria, validity, and reliability. If we do so, we will not only solve the medical condition/evaluation problem that Mr. Vetter describes, but we will be able to solve a great many other problems, too!

Best wishes
  • Posted 26 Jul 2013 16:30
  • Modified 27 Jul 2013 00:22 by poster
  • By joe_m
  • joined 14 Oct'05 - 68 messages
  • New Jersey, United States
www.LIFTOR.com
Operator/Examiner Certification for In-House Supervisors
jmonaco@LIFTOR.com
Showing items 1 - 1 of 1 results.
I would have thought that, (as what I thought Mr Vitter was speaking about was physical limitations of powered industrial truck operators,) to not have mentioned the new rules/protections regarding weight of operators and their PPE in 'man-up' order picker-stock picker type of units that just came into recognition this last February 2013, seems like omitting an important part of the conversation.
I call it protection, since it now gives firm numbers to the maximum operator weights allowed and with which type of fall arrest device that should be worn. while previously I would have been hesitant to not pass someone severely overweight, now I have a regulation (with firm numbers) to point at as why that person MUST not be permitted to operate that particular unit.
  • Posted 27 Jul 2013 09:44
  • By edward_t
  • joined 5 Mar'08 - 2,334 messages
  • South Carolina, United States
"it's not rocket surgery"

Post your Reply

Forkliftaction accepts no responsibility for forum content and requires forum participants to adhere to our rules of conduct. Click here for more information.

If you are having trouble using the Discussion Forums, please contact us for help.

Global Industry News
edition #1252 - 16 October 2025
In this week’s Forkliftaction News , we report on the GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index which shows Asian supply chains are at their busiest since June 2022 while the US and Europe’s supply chains remain under-utilised. One of the report authors describes the situation as being “as stable as it’s going to get”... Continue reading
Movers & Shakers
Jim Tompkins Jim Tompkins
Chairman of the board, Tompkins Solutions
Director of government affairs, Associated Equipment Distributors
National dealer development manager, Castle Equipment Company
Sales operations, Heli
JLG G12-55A
Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, United States
Used - Sale & Hire
Morooka MFD20
Yokohama, Japan
Used - Sale
JLG G12-55A
Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, United States
Used - Sale & Hire
Morooka MFD20
Yokohama, Japan
Used - Sale
Global Industry News
edition #1252 - 16 October 2025
In this week’s Forkliftaction News , we report on the GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index which shows Asian supply chains are at their busiest since June 2022 while the US and Europe’s supply chains remain under-utilised. One of the report authors describes the situation as being “as stable as it’s going to get”... Continue reading
Fact of the week
Brussels Airport in Belgium, Europe is the world's largest sales point for chocolate, with over 800 tonnes of chocolate sold annually. This averages out to about 1.5 kilograms sold every minute.