Report this forum post

I'll throw in my thoughts. Having worked for Yale for many years the biggest differece I see between NACCO and Toyota is simplicity (I now work for Toyota). Toyota has had one engine and basically one transmission for 21 years. NACCO has the two Mazda engines (Very good engines) and the 3.0L GM engine (Not nearly as good as Mazda, but more power). They have three engines and four transmissions. By my count this is a possible 12 combinations (I know only certain packages are offered). Toyota has one transmission with one engine.

The old GLC050RGNUAE083s were great trucks but the Veracitor may have been too big a step without the proper engineering resources.

By the way, does anyone remember what the "J" in the older Yale model number stood for? GLC030CBJUAT083?

Does anyone know what the "U" stands for in a Toyota model 7FGCU15.
  • Posted 11 Sep 2007 12:03
  • Modified 11 Sep 2007 12:04 by poster
  • By Toyotaman
  • joined 5 Apr'07 - 56 messages
  • Rhode Island, United States

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Bobcat appoints new UK dealer Liverpool, United Kingdom
Toyota launches three new stackers Columbus, IN, United States
Global Industry News
edition #1244 - 21 August 2025
In our feel good story for the week, we report on a donation from Wisconsin-headquartered Big Joe Forklifts to the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s College of Engineering, after discovering the institution was still using one of its 1960s walkie stackers... Continue reading

Showcased in the Virtual Expo