Report this forum post

Johnr-j is correct in his advice.

However if you are only going to carry the load at a low height - that is much lower than the maximum lift of the mast - then the formula is as follows:

Rated load x (rated distance plus the distance from the fork face to the centre of the drive axle) = modified rating x (modified distance plus the distance from the fork face to the centre of the drive axle).

For example a 2000 kg @ 24 in forklift plus 16 in from fork face to centre of drive axle would have a revised rating of 2000 x (24 + 16) = revised rating x ( 78 + 16) giving a rating of 850 kg.

Note that this revised rating includes the effect of the carpet prong on stability. Assuming the prong is supported on the forks, and the prong weighs 100 kg then conservatively the device can carry a roll of carpet 850 - 100 = 750 kg.

It is still recommended that the manufacturer be contacted re a new rating as they can give the rating at full mast height.
  • Posted 30 Mar 2007 16:21
  • By John_Lambert
  • joined 30 May'06 - 74 messages
  • Victoria, Australia
Better to strive and experience all life's colours from pain to ecstasy than to exist in a grey life

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Movers & Shakers
Steve Dimitrovski Steve Dimitrovski
Director sales for Australia and New Zealand, Swisslog
General Manager, Forkpro Australia
Global CEO, Swisslog
Board member, UKMHA
Aichi RX07B
Yokohama, Japan
Used - Sale
UN Forklift FBRP15NQZ2
HANGZHOU, Zhejiang, China
New - Sale

PREMIUM business

Hyster
Hyster is a world-leading provider of forklift trucks and services in the materials handling industry.
Global Industry News
edition #1245 - 28 August 2025
In this week’s Forkliftaction News , we look at MHEDA’s Q3 Economic Advisory Report which reveals current resilience in the US materials handling sector... Continue reading
Fact of the week
The word "okay" (or its abbreviation "OK") originated as a humorous misspelling. In the 1830s, a fad in Boston involved using abbreviations of intentionally misspelled phrases. "OK" stood for "oll korrect," a playful mispronunciation of "all correct".