Report this forum post

Thankyou for your valueable input. This is exactly the type of information I was looking for as it highlights some concerns that others may also have. The concern of false detection and annoyance to operators if the system was continually being activated during the normal part of their operation.

Our systems use an "active" monitoring where a device is located on the areas,people or objects that must be avoided. This means the alert will not be activated on objects that are not fitted with a device. The range of detection can be set individually for each device. For example it may be that the system activates when within 4m of a person wearing a device but is set to 1m for another object.

Any other ideas/comments please ?

Regards

David
  • Posted 19 Jul 2006 09:31
  • By Orbit
  • joined 11 Jul'06 - 5 messages
  • New South Wales, Australia
regards

David Huisman
Managing Director
Orbit Communications
www.orbitcoms.com
NSW, Australia

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Fact of the week
The word "okay" (or its abbreviation "OK") originated as a humorous misspelling. In the 1830s, a fad in Boston involved using abbreviations of intentionally misspelled phrases. "OK" stood for "oll korrect," a playful mispronunciation of "all correct".
Fact of the week
The word "okay" (or its abbreviation "OK") originated as a humorous misspelling. In the 1830s, a fad in Boston involved using abbreviations of intentionally misspelled phrases. "OK" stood for "oll korrect," a playful mispronunciation of "all correct".