Discussion:
Calif. Ct. App. Affirms $1.8 Million Verdict in Forklift Injury Case

Calif. Ct. App. Affirms $1.8 Million Verdict in Forklift Injury Case

By NICK SULLIVAN, Andrews Publications Staff Writer

A state appeals court in California has affirmed a $1.8 million jury award to a forklift operator who lost a leg in an accident, rejecting defense arguments that the plaintiff should have been required to prove the existence of a feasible safer design.
The appeals court said the burden was on the defendant, Toyota Industrial Equipment Manufacturing Inc., to show that the benefits of the allegedly defective design outweighed the risks.
Court records say Eugenio Feliciano was severely injured in January 2003 when a tire on a Toyota Series 7 forklift split and caused the machine to topple over, crushing his leg.
Feliciano sued Toyota in the San Mateo County Superior Court, claiming that the defective design of the Series 7 put excessive stress on the tires.
In 2005 the jury returned a 9-3 verdict and awarded Feliciano $1.8 million for lost wages, medical expenses, and pain and suffering.
Affirming, the California 1st District Court of Appeal held, "Toyota's assertion that a plaintiff in a strict-liability design-defect case must prove the feasibility of a safer alternative design is an assertion that is founded on cases from other jurisdictions and has no support under California law."
The panel said that contrary to the defendant's argument, there is no split on this issue, with the California Supreme Court having "spoken unequivocally" in Barker v. Lull Engineering Co., 20 Cal. 3d 413, 429 (1978); Campbell v. General Motors Corp. 32 Cal. 3d 112, 118-119 (1982); and Soule v. General Motors Corp., 8 Cal. 4th 548, 560 (1994).
The appeals court also said sufficient evidence supported the verdict.
It was undisputed, the court noted, that Toyota's "system of active stability" suspension mechanism puts greater lateral force on forklift tires than a conventional design.
Feliciano presented evidence that Series 7 forklifts used the same tires as conventional models that did not have the SAS mechanism, the panel added.
  • Posted 24 Jan 2009 03:40
  • Discussion started by EasyM
  • South Carolina, United States

Post your Reply

Forkliftaction.com accepts no responsibility for forum content and requires forum participants to adhere to the rules. Click here for more information.

Having trouble using the Discussion Forums? Contact us for help.

Global Industry News
edition #1230 - 15 May 2025
It’s been a big week of news with Jungheinrich’s financial reports for Q1 released at the same time it launched its new Stategy2030+, its strategic framework for the next five years (see story)... Continue reading

PREMIUM business

RAEDER-VOGEL
Innovative high-quality wheels and castors for the forklift industry.
Fact of the week
Architect Gustave Eiffel originally submitted his design for the Eiffel Tower to Barcelona but the city rejected it for aesthetic reasons. As we know, he had more success in Paris, however, his plan was far from popular at the time.