Discussion:
osha regs

what is the official line on welded on load back rests. many attachments are equipped with permanent lbr assy's so it seems it would be inconsistent to have differing standards but i am never suprised by osha. anyone have any info?
  • Posted 28 Jan 2010 12:12
  • Discussion started by rick_c
  • Texas, United States
technology: (no user serviceable parts inside)
Showing items 1 - 3 of 3 results.
rick c:

The dealer probably could not be cited by OSHA for such a violation. It could trigger, however, an OSHA inspection of the dealer's facilities. Such activity by the dealer always leaves the possibility of civil action by the employer who may be cited.

Where the "safe operation" starts and stops is a gray area. When in doubt go with the manufacturer's written authorization.

Using a certified welder may not be sufficient. Can the welder determine how much of a weld is necessary for the maximum forces that could be imposed on the load backrest extension? Do the bolts you use as replacement meet the tensile strength set by the manufacturer? Are the bolts cheap knock-offs? These are the questions that must be asked where life or death is involved.

One of the concepts of risk management is to pass the risk on to others where possible. In your case it may cause some delay and extra cost at the time. It will most likely, however, save you a bundle in the long run.
  • Posted 29 Jan 2010 22:59
  • Reply by joseph_h
  • Michigan, United States
thank you joseph, i really appreciate your response. i interpreted the rule the same way but it is a little vague about "improvements" that do not actually change the capacity or safety systems ie: original bolts in place on an lbr and additionally a weld performed by a certified welder, the only sticking point is that the customer made these mod's. we occaisonally do this as part of the make ready when requested but we are a dealer. this situation has come up very recently and osha cited the customer. it's being appealed. (they love that) what's your personal opinion on this subject?
  • Posted 29 Jan 2010 12:18
  • Reply by rick_c
  • Texas, United States
technology: (no user serviceable parts inside)
rick c:

For an official interpretation you would have to contact federal OSHA @ 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) Toll Free U.S.; or go to osha.gov on the internet and click on contact us. Go to "Do You Have Workplace Safety & Health Related Questions?:" and click on the e-mail or electronic mail form to submit your question.

My interpretation is as follows:

The U.S. OSHA regulations do not differentiate between a fixed or removable load backrest extension:

OSHA 1910.178(m)(10): "A load backrest extension shall be used whenever necessary to minimize the possibility of the load or part of it from falling rearward."

There should not be any problem if the load backrest extension comes fixed by the manufacturer. If the employer has the removable load backrest extension welded, the employer could be in violation unless the employer has the manufacturer's prior written approval.

OSHA 1910.178(a)(4): "Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation shall not be performed by the customer or user without manufacturers prior written approval. Capacity, operation, and maintenance instruction plates, tags, or decals shall be changed accordingly."

If the load backrest extension is not properly welded, the welds could break causing the load backrest extension and or load to fall on the operator which would affect safe operation. It should be noted that a falling object protection structure (FOPS) on a forklift does not provide full impact protection to the operator.

OSHA 1910.178(m)(9): "An overhead guard shall be used as protection against falling objects. It should be noted that an overhead guard is intended to offer protection from the impact of small packages, boxes, bagged material, etc., representative of the job application, but not to withstand the impact of a falling capacity load."
  • Posted 29 Jan 2010 05:36
  • Modified 29 Jan 2010 10:38 by poster
  • Reply by joseph_h
  • Michigan, United States

Post your Reply

Forkliftaction.com accepts no responsibility for forum content and requires forum participants to adhere to the rules. Click here for more information.

Having trouble using the Discussion Forums? Contact us for help.

UN Forklift FB25N1QZ1
HANGZHOU, Zhejiang, China
New - Sale
Toyota 8FD45
Yokohama, Japan
Used - Sale
Global Industry News
edition #1228 - 1 May 2025
There is simply no ignoring the push for a greener, more sustainable materials handling equipment industry as manufacturers and customers alike seek eco-friendly solutions to reduce or eliminate carbon emissions... Continue reading
Fact of the week
On average, people read 10-30% slower from a screen than from paper.
Movers & Shakers
Linda Häkkilä Linda Häkkilä
vice president, Investor Relations, Konecranes
vice president operations, Elokon Group
President, EP Equipment Europe
Senior vice president human resources, Kalmar
UN Forklift FD50T-NJB3
HANGZHOU, Zhejiang, China
New - Sale
Komatsu FD25T17
Braeside, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Hire