Report this forum post

I honestly don't see anything wrong with Toyota sponsoring the test or choosing the participants. There is nothing wrong with a manufacturer commissioning and paying for tests to prove the efficiency of their product nor is it "dirty" to choose the participants it thinks are its closest rivals. My questions: Are the participants in the test not worthy rivals of Toyota's forklift? And, is the methodology for this test questionable? Only these two points beg discussion.
  • Posted 19 Dec 2005 09:49
  • Modified 19 Dec 2005 09:52 by poster
  • By Chrissa
  • joined 29 Jul'05 - 10 messages
  • Queensland, Australia

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Global Industry News
edition #1237 - 3 July 2025
While innovation and new technology are evolving at what seems to be an ever-increasing pace, the need to capture the data (telemetry) from this tech, and the ability to utilise it (telematics) for efficiency and cost savings, is one area attracting more and more attention ... Continue reading
Movers & Shakers
Jeannette Walker Jeannette Walker
CEO, MHEDA
President, European Rental Association (ERA)
Chief marketing officer, JLT Mobile Computers
Chief executive officer, East Penn Manufacturing
Movers & Shakers
Jeannette Walker Jeannette Walker
CEO, MHEDA
President, European Rental Association (ERA)
Chief marketing officer, JLT Mobile Computers
Chief executive officer, East Penn Manufacturing
Fact of the week
The use of "hello" as a telephone greeting is attributed to Thomas Edison. He is said to have suggested it as a simpler alternative to other greetings, such as "Do I get you?" or "Are you there?".