Report this forum post

I honestly don't see anything wrong with Toyota sponsoring the test or choosing the participants. There is nothing wrong with a manufacturer commissioning and paying for tests to prove the efficiency of their product nor is it "dirty" to choose the participants it thinks are its closest rivals. My questions: Are the participants in the test not worthy rivals of Toyota's forklift? And, is the methodology for this test questionable? Only these two points beg discussion.
  • Posted 19 Dec 2005 09:49
  • Modified 19 Dec 2005 09:52 by poster
  • By Chrissa
  • joined 29 Jul'05 - 10 messages
  • Queensland, Australia

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Latest job alerts …
Philadelphia, United States
Prospect CT, United States
Davenport, IA, United States
Dayton OH/Cincinnati OH, United States
Upcoming in the editorial calendar
MANAGING MIXED FLEETS
Oct 2025
ASSET FINANCE
Nov 2025
Latest job alerts …
Philadelphia, United States
Prospect CT, United States
Davenport, IA, United States
Dayton OH/Cincinnati OH, United States
Fact of the week
Brothers Adolf ("Adi") and Rudolf ("Rudi") Dassler split their shoe company after WWII due to a bitter feud, and established the rival companies of Adidas and Puma. Their personal animosity and business rivalry divided their German hometown Herzogenaurach. The town became known as "the town of bent necks" due to the intense loyalty to each brand.