just be honest exhalt
you're calling it 'zero emission' as a sales gimmick
your real goal is to eliminate fossil fuel use altogether is it not?
that's what all this is about if your "up" on the fight for the removal of fossil fuel use in our economy.
although i must admit using the term "100% zero emission" is a crafty way of selling a machine to those that are ignorant to the mechanics of internal combustion specifics and are supportive of this economic environmentalism movement.
First it was carbon monoxide producing smog pollution, now it's carbon dioxide causing global warming although data monitoring has indicated that the warming effect has actually not increased over the last decade or so as they predicted in previous climate model simulations so whats up with that, seems to contradict the origional claims that our C02 contribution to the environment is the casue doesn't it?
Next thing they go after is, what?
oh yeah,
you actually have to produce this thing to support your claims, where is it?