Report this forum post

This should really be a matter of common sense.
Of course you may have to travel with an elevated load to clear an obstacle albeit at a drastically reduced speed.
Generally fork travel height varies depending who you talk too but generally under 12".
The most logical ive heard was between ankle and knee height. If someone'**** with a fork your talking a serious injury and the 2 straight bones in your lower leg are a **** site easier for a surgeon to piece back together then an ankle or knee joint and less chance of a permanent life changing injury - morbid but does make sense.
Really you should just be travelling with the forks as low as practical but we can't surround everything with a set 'number' in legislation.
  • Posted 15 May 2019 16:06
  • By wiggy
  • joined 23 Jan'14 - 66 messages
  • kent, United Kingdom

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Global Industry News
edition #1259 - 4 December 2025
In this week’s Forkliftaction News , we look at the November Logistics Manager’s Index which has dropped to the lowest it has been since June 2024... Continue reading
Global Industry News
edition #1259 - 4 December 2025
In this week’s Forkliftaction News , we look at the November Logistics Manager’s Index which has dropped to the lowest it has been since June 2024... Continue reading
Movers & Shakers
Michel Denis Michel Denis
President and CEO, Manitou Group
Vice president of sales, Barclay Brand Ferdon
Board chair, Australian Supply Chain & Logistics Association (ASCLA)
Strategic business development manager, Heli Materials Handling Oceania