Report this forum post

This should really be a matter of common sense.
Of course you may have to travel with an elevated load to clear an obstacle albeit at a drastically reduced speed.
Generally fork travel height varies depending who you talk too but generally under 12".
The most logical ive heard was between ankle and knee height. If someone'**** with a fork your talking a serious injury and the 2 straight bones in your lower leg are a **** site easier for a surgeon to piece back together then an ankle or knee joint and less chance of a permanent life changing injury - morbid but does make sense.
Really you should just be travelling with the forks as low as practical but we can't surround everything with a set 'number' in legislation.
  • Posted 15 May 2019 16:06
  • By wiggy
  • joined 23 Jan'14 - 66 messages
  • kent, United Kingdom

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Global Industry News
edition #1237 - 3 July 2025
While innovation and new technology are evolving at what seems to be an ever-increasing pace, the need to capture the data (telemetry) from this tech, and the ability to utilise it (telematics) for efficiency and cost savings, is one area attracting more and more attention ... Continue reading
Upcoming in the editorial calendar
WIRELESS CHARGING
Aug 2025
MANAGING MIXED FLEETS
Oct 2025