Discussion:
What is a "Japanese" forklift?

I see the term "Japanese" forklift used as a derogatory term at Forkliftaction discussion groups by some of its members from time to time. I would like to know what forklifts fall into that group and which forklifts do not. Or even if there is such a thing as a "Japanese" forklift. Also I would like to know what is wrong (or right) with "Japanese" forklifts.

Thanks!
  • Posted 9 Jun 2007 22:10
  • Discussion started by steve_l
  • Tennessee, United States
We are what we want to be if we work hard enough....
Showing items 1 - 15 of 17 results.
They are also called gray market trucks. These units are used in Japan for an amount of time and then loaded into containers and shipped off to be auctioned off. A place I worked at would buy these things site unseen and refurb/ resell them. Sometimes we didnt even know what all was in the container. Lots of these trucks are manual trans.
  • Posted 4 Nov 2007 03:35
  • Modified 4 Nov 2007 03:37 by poster
  • Reply by bobby
  • Texas, United States
I would think that some people call it a Japanes forklift when
a) the original mother company is Japan (or Asian) based)
b) the parts manual is in Japanese and English

Just my POV...
  • Posted 23 Aug 2007 20:26
  • Reply by Firehawk
  • West-Vlaanderen, Belgium
One Atta_Boy for Etharp!

Study one's history prior to opening mouth!


Way to go Ed!

Doc
  • Posted 16 Aug 2007 10:40
  • Reply by Drlifttruck
  • Texas, United States
Lift Trucks all the same, just painted different colors.
Doc
Email: kulsh@forkliftservice.net
If you feel that you jumped in late you can imagine me.
Well here i am just to tell you what **** forklifts mean in south africa. Here people like to buy cheap everythying. It must be a bargain and last forever at half the price of a Linde. To my staff and myself **** forklift means good quality and technology at an afforable price to even the smallest bussiness owner. And believe me brother i am not kissing butt with the agents but the **** trucks are tough and good looking plus easy to work on and spares are dirt cheap.
  • Posted 9 Aug 2007 02:33
  • Reply by Marcel
  • Durban, South Africa
I am going to jump in (I know a little late) with a couple of comments. First I have been in the lift truck industry since 1974 and have seen a few changes.. The first "Japanese" lift I saw in the US was a Yale built by
Sumitomo who still builds Hysters and Yales... I now sell a "Japanese" branded machine but allways use the terms US branded or Japanese
branded as you can't tell where most parts come from... Clark is owned by a Korean hat maker, Cat/Towmotor is a Mitzi brand... I don't think any castings are US anymore, but south american or far eastern. Like it or not
the lines are blurrirng and we can't stop it.....
  • Posted 4 Aug 2007 07:11
  • Reply by LiftDuck
  • Tennessee, United States
etharp - interesting reply. Particularly in relation to defining the competition as opposed to defining oneself and in your opinion it being a less intelligent method of attempting to equalize a negative for fear of uncertainty & doubt. I think you may have misunderstood in that I make no attempt to "pull them down" and in fact use facts based on truck sales, manufacturing processes and respect for its employees American or other and obviously not sweat shops in China. These processes are used and copied worldwide - heard of TPS, Kaizen, Kanban, JIT, Genchi Genbutsu. Ask any manufacturer about its environmental commitments and policy and you will see Toyota sets the standard. Ask about the economy in Columbus, In. or the fact that 99% of all American market trucks are built in North America, ask about the number of employees employed in the US or the revenue created. There must be good reason why they hold the position of market leader in the US and in fact worldwide. We live with a global economy and I agree 100% with your point about child or slave labour and I'm sure you're not trying to imply that Toyota operate such practices.
  • Posted 27 Jul 2007 22:37
  • Reply by dave_j
  • West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Allow me to summarize, firstly what difference does it really make where the truck is built as long as it complies with all the countries legislation regarding safety, emissions etc. Secondly Toyota builds all its trucks in the country where is sells most of particular models, Compact in US, European specification in France, Italian brands surprisingly in Italy and the models for the Far East in Japan. They don't believe in shipping huge quantities around the world when they can be built "locally". That's why they have worldwide manufacturing plants. They use predominently Toyota engines as thees are designed specifically for industrial equipment not automobile engines as others do particularly in Europe with VW. Now as we don't sell many compacts in Europe it makes no sense to build them there. I just needed to clear up a few things. (Toyota Salesman!!)
  • Posted 27 Jul 2007 18:31
  • Reply by dave_j
  • West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
No matter where the truck componetry comes from or where it is made - it must conform to the the design and quality standards set forth by the head offices of these Japanese brand name companies.

Similar trucks models built in the US are different than those built in Japan for their domestic market from some respects - 1.) they don't need to comply to our CARB regulations; 2.) The don't need to comply with UL; 3.) Often the engines used in Jpan are smaller in HP than those use in the US. 4.) Three stage masts for counterbalanced trucks are a rarity in Japan.

I think you are hung up on content - most Japanese manfucaturers want to include as much US content in their brands as feasible to comply with the "built or made in the US" which allows them to participate without penalty on various government projects without penalty. Again they make those changes as long as they comply with head office standard of design and quality.
  • Posted 29 Jun 2007 23:53
  • Reply by johnr_j
  • Georgia, United States
Class 1 is great for Toyota, Class 3 is getting better today and Class 2 is a different story.
  • Posted 29 Jun 2007 09:16
  • Reply by Toyotaman
  • Rhode Island, United States
I see your point on the insides being very similar. But is that because every manufacturer has to contend with the same laws of physics, has to comply with the same CARB standards, and has to satisfy the same customer requirements? That may be the start of an answer to your question.

Also, when you pull the exteriors of all these forklifts what power train manufacturers are we seeing? With exception of a very few GM engines sold, we see Nissan, Mazda, Mitsubishi, and Toyota. Does anyone disagree that the power trains on these forklifts represent in excess of 50% of the value of the components? Are the "traditional US manufactures" in a state of denial on this issue? Why are we not using Ford, Chrysler, or GM power trains in all our forklifts? My answer to this question is simple and I believe is true. Because OUR CUSTOMERS told us what power trains they want through their purchasing decisions.

Of course this discussion does not restrict us to just ICE forklifts. Anyone else have a market where Class I, II, and III represents over 50% of the forklift sales in their territories? Any Japanese forklifts in that group?

Thanks for the ideas and insights!
  • Posted 28 Jun 2007 08:35
  • Reply by steve_l
  • Tennessee, United States
We are what we want to be if we work hard enough....
As some of you may remember, some time ago themost of the manufacturers that trucks exported to the US from Japan were charged and found guilty with "dumping". They all had to post a bond (Tariff) which varied depending on the severity of the "dumping". Most argued that it was unfair and thier argument was that mosts trucks sold in Asia and Europe were sold by agents or company owned stores whereas in the US most dealers are independant.
In order to negate the Tariff, the affected parties would have to have thier trucks "made" in the US.
I still consider these manufacturers to be "Japanese". It seems to me that all of these trucks are eerily similar to each other and once the leader, Toyota redesigns a truck, the rest follow suit. I am refering mostly to the cosmetics of the truck. I also believe that in most cases(except for SAS), if you were to lift the chassis off a "Japanese" truck, not only would they all pretty much be the same, but they would also show that none of them have any significant changes or improvements in the last 25 years.
  • Posted 27 Jun 2007 23:54
  • Reply by duodeluxe
  • United States
duodeluxe
So Steve,

If you have consoles built in China, frames built in Mexico and engines built in Japan. BUT they're assembled in Kentucky. What does this make them? Chexanese?
  • Posted 27 Jun 2007 12:43
  • Modified 27 Jun 2007 12:44 by poster
  • Reply by Toyotaman
  • Rhode Island, United States
I was told by a member of the forklift community that there is a large forklift mfg based in the US that is sourcing plastic parts and consoles from China. Anyone know the truth to that?

Also, Tateo, I believe that you are on topic, actually. I am asking the question what is a Japanese forklift and you just made me wonder how you define a US forklift.

Hmmmm....
  • Posted 27 Jun 2007 12:16
  • Reply by steve_l
  • Tennessee, United States
We are what we want to be if we work hard enough....
It all depends on how you want to use or express. And there's, I think, no need to specifically clarify the country of origin. We are not the tax collector.

My personal surprise when I visited first to US in early '80, not a few people thought "Sony" was a US company.

Toyotaman's definition is very close to US International Trade Commission's decision made by June 1988 for the anti dumping case on Japanese forklift trucks to US market.

Everybody agrees that it is useless to determine a "nationality" of multi national conglomerates.

Many understands Clark is a US company while the rest believes it became a Korean company. Is Kion a US company, or German? But, who can tell the nationality of KKR and Goldman Sachs. Their money comes from all over the World.

For me, Kalmar is a Swedish maker rather than a Finnish.
Therefore, I understand, it all depends how you want to interpret except tax imposition cases.

Sorry, I know I'm away from what Steve I raised.
  • Posted 27 Jun 2007 11:24
  • Reply by tateo_i
  • Tokyo, Japan
I'll stir the pot a little.

In my opinion it's where the frame is built (stamped and welded), mast is built and the truck is assembled.

If the the above is done partially or completely in Japan, then it's Japanese.
  • Posted 27 Jun 2007 08:47
  • Reply by Toyotaman
  • Rhode Island, United States

Post your Reply

Forkliftaction.com accepts no responsibility for forum content and requires forum participants to adhere to the rules. Click here for more information.

Having trouble using the Discussion Forums? Contact us for help.

Movers & Shakers
Florian Heydenreich Florian Heydenreich
managing director sales and service, Still
President - Europe, Middle East and Africa, Rockwell Automation
managing director Linde Material Handling GmbH, Linde Materials Handling
senior vice president, Industrial Service and Equipment, EMEA, Konecranes
Caterpillar financial results Woking, United Kingdom
Fact of the week
The British Museum relies on moisture from visitors' breath to increase humidity and stop their wood and bone artefacts from cracking. During Covid lockdowns, some items had to be moved to climate-controlled storage.
Caterpillar financial results Woking, United Kingdom
Briefs Munich, Germany
Upcoming in the editorial calendar
FORKLIFT DAMAGE PREVENTION
Nov 2024
AGV FORKLIFT MANUFACTURERS
Feb 2025