Report this forum post

I see your point on the insides being very similar. But is that because every manufacturer has to contend with the same laws of physics, has to comply with the same CARB standards, and has to satisfy the same customer requirements? That may be the start of an answer to your question.

Also, when you pull the exteriors of all these forklifts what power train manufacturers are we seeing? With exception of a very few GM engines sold, we see Nissan, Mazda, Mitsubishi, and Toyota. Does anyone disagree that the power trains on these forklifts represent in excess of 50% of the value of the components? Are the "traditional US manufactures" in a state of denial on this issue? Why are we not using Ford, Chrysler, or GM power trains in all our forklifts? My answer to this question is simple and I believe is true. Because OUR CUSTOMERS told us what power trains they want through their purchasing decisions.

Of course this discussion does not restrict us to just ICE forklifts. Anyone else have a market where Class I, II, and III represents over 50% of the forklift sales in their territories? Any Japanese forklifts in that group?

Thanks for the ideas and insights!
  • Posted 28 Jun 2007 08:35
  • By steve_l
  • joined 11 Nov'05 - 20 messages
  • Tennessee, United States
We are what we want to be if we work hard enough....

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Toplift Ferrari TFC36-48
Stoney Creek, Ontario, Canada
Used - Sale
USD1
Toyota 8FGU25
Flesherton, Ontario, Canada
Used - Sale
Latest job alerts …
Tacoma, WA, United States
Highland, IL, United States
Orlando area, United States
Dallas, TX or Lexington, KY, United States