Report this forum post

I've had this conversation on other threads. I don't think one is better than the other. I believe that the tax structure of our different countries makes renting a better alternative in the UK, where buying is more advantageous in the US.

Even though the service costs pass to the provider in the UK, the provider is in the business of making money, so therefore, the cost is ultimately factored into the rental price which the customer pays. It would be interesting to compare rental costs between our 2 countries.

Being a small independent limits my access to international commerce, but the few customers & vendors I deal with that have done business in the UK all had the same underlying message- they found the business costs in the UK were more than the US. They felt that England had more technology, but at a much higher price.
  • Posted 18 Sep 2012 23:23
  • Modified 18 Sep 2012 23:32 by poster
  • By bbforks
  • joined 1 Mar'12 - 1,437 messages
  • Pennsylvania, United States
bbforks (at) Hotmail (dot) com
Customers love technology- until they have to pay to fix it!

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Movers & Shakers
Sue Tomic Sue Tomic
Board chair, Australian Supply Chain & Logistics Association (ASCLA)
Strategic business development manager, Heli Materials Handling Oceania
Chief executive officer, Hire Industry Association of New Zealand (HIANZ)
Chief executive officer, Australian Supply Chain & Logistics Association (ASCLA)
Movers & Shakers
Sue Tomic Sue Tomic
Board chair, Australian Supply Chain & Logistics Association (ASCLA)
Strategic business development manager, Heli Materials Handling Oceania
Chief executive officer, Hire Industry Association of New Zealand (HIANZ)
Chief executive officer, Australian Supply Chain & Logistics Association (ASCLA)
Latest job alerts …