Report this forum post

no lost lit's directly related to SAS. it's a system to make you "safer" not "SAFE". nothing is idiot proof and the service interval is the PM interval. no one else has it because they havn't figured out a way to do it without infringing on the patent rights. why is every one so down on a system that "improves" not "guarantees" the operators safety level. i think it's sour grapes and wallet envy.
  • Posted 11 Nov 2010 02:35
  • By toyzilla
  • joined 29 Mar'10 - 175 messages
  • Texas, United States
easier to ask forgiveness than to ask permission.

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Global Industry News
edition #1260 - 11 December 2025
In this week’s Forkliftaction News we report on DHL Supply Chain signing a deal to deploy autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) at its Mexican retail operations and look at Guidance Automation’s successful trial of an AMR with a hydrogen fuel cell... Continue reading
Editorial calendar - planned features
CONSTRUCTION FORKLIFTS
HANDLING GOODS IN THE COLD
LOADING/UNLOADING FREIGHT
BROWNFIELD AUTOMATION
FORKLIFT ATTACHMENTS
BATTERY AFFORDABILITY AND LIFETIME
FORKLIFT SAFETY