Report this forum post

I have to agree with Safety Guy in that the on-truck evaluation, test, skills check, etc. is a useful tool when it renders a simple decision of Pass or Fail. Using the general education method of ratings, point systems or "percent correct" for on-truck operator skills evaluation makes us look silly at least and irresponsible at worst. Here is why:


Assuming that our on-truck evaluation is valid and NOT superficial, we are testing operator skills against objective criterion measures essential for success on-the-job (We do NOT test for unnecessary behavior, as that would make for the silly part).


So, if during an evaluation, the "operator put his hand outside the overhead guard" we are morally and ethically obligated to DENY his certification for that attempt. Then, until such time that he can practice the correct "keep-body-parts-inside" behavior, and then pass the item during a subsequent attempt of that test item, he/she will NOT PASS the evaluation. To do otherwise is the equivalent of saying that either our on-truck evaluation of "keep-body-parts-inside" behavior is:


1. superficial (which it is NOT), or

2. we are allowing operators to sally-forth on their job knowing full well that they do NOT have one of the ESSENTIAL safe behaviors in their repertory of operating skills.


That would be the irresponsible part...because the lack of skill could result in severe personal injury of body parts and/or death to the operator.


So, what should we do in the future to improve our contribution to safe forklift operating? Learning more about effective "Evaluation" or "Testing" practices might be a good place to go for those serious about improving their contributions to our industry. Some information about pass/fail testing can be had for free at:


WWW dot LIFTOR dot COM (Ask George);

WWW dot OFCCP dot GOV (Content Validity/Selection Testing); and

Also, you can purchase at WWW dot ASSE dot ORG - ANSI Z490.1-2009 "Criteria for Accepted Practices in Safety Health and Environmental Training."


Best wishes,

Joe
  • Posted 9 Sep 2009 13:47
  • Modified 9 Sep 2009 13:54 by poster
  • By joe_m
  • joined 14 Oct'05 - 68 messages
  • New Jersey, United States
www.LIFTOR.com
Operator/Examiner Certification for In-House Supervisors
jmonaco@LIFTOR.com

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Fact of the week
Foundling hatches are safe, anonymous drop-off points for unwanted infants, allowing parents in crisis a way to surrender a baby safely without fear of punishment, ensuring the child is rescued and cared for. The concept started in the 12th century, was abandoned in the late 19th century, then reintroduced in 1952. It has since been adopted in many countries.
Global Industry News
edition #1260 - 11 December 2025
In this week’s Forkliftaction News we report on DHL Supply Chain signing a deal to deploy autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) at its Mexican retail operations and look at Guidance Automation’s successful trial of an AMR with a hydrogen fuel cell... Continue reading
Global Industry News
edition #1260 - 11 December 2025
In this week’s Forkliftaction News we report on DHL Supply Chain signing a deal to deploy autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) at its Mexican retail operations and look at Guidance Automation’s successful trial of an AMR with a hydrogen fuel cell... Continue reading
Fact of the week
Foundling hatches are safe, anonymous drop-off points for unwanted infants, allowing parents in crisis a way to surrender a baby safely without fear of punishment, ensuring the child is rescued and cared for. The concept started in the 12th century, was abandoned in the late 19th century, then reintroduced in 1952. It has since been adopted in many countries.