Report this forum post

Calif. Ct. App. Affirms $1.8 Million Verdict in Forklift Injury Case

By NICK SULLIVAN, Andrews Publications Staff Writer

A state appeals court in California has affirmed a $1.8 million jury award to a forklift operator who lost a leg in an accident, rejecting defense arguments that the plaintiff should have been required to prove the existence of a feasible safer design.
The appeals court said the burden was on the defendant, Toyota Industrial Equipment Manufacturing Inc., to show that the benefits of the allegedly defective design outweighed the risks.
Court records say Eugenio Feliciano was severely injured in January 2003 when a tire on a Toyota Series 7 forklift split and caused the machine to topple over, crushing his leg.
Feliciano sued Toyota in the San Mateo County Superior Court, claiming that the defective design of the Series 7 put excessive stress on the tires.
In 2005 the jury returned a 9-3 verdict and awarded Feliciano $1.8 million for lost wages, medical expenses, and pain and suffering.
Affirming, the California 1st District Court of Appeal held, "Toyota's assertion that a plaintiff in a strict-liability design-defect case must prove the feasibility of a safer alternative design is an assertion that is founded on cases from other jurisdictions and has no support under California law."
The panel said that contrary to the defendant's argument, there is no split on this issue, with the California Supreme Court having "spoken unequivocally" in Barker v. Lull Engineering Co., 20 Cal. 3d 413, 429 (1978); Campbell v. General Motors Corp. 32 Cal. 3d 112, 118-119 (1982); and Soule v. General Motors Corp., 8 Cal. 4th 548, 560 (1994).
The appeals court also said sufficient evidence supported the verdict.
It was undisputed, the court noted, that Toyota's "system of active stability" suspension mechanism puts greater lateral force on forklift tires than a conventional design.
Feliciano presented evidence that Series 7 forklifts used the same tires as conventional models that did not have the SAS mechanism, the panel added.
  • Posted 24 Jan 2009 03:40
  • By EasyM
  • joined 14 May'05 - 101 messages
  • South Carolina, United States

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
UN Forklift FBR25NQC3
HANGZHOU, Zhejiang, China
New - Sale
Terberg YT222
Balling, Denmark
Used - Sale

PREMIUM business

ROYPOW
Manufacturer of lithium forklift battery solutions, the global leader in the market of lithium batteries replacing lead acid batteries.
Upcoming in the editorial calendar
MANAGING MIXED FLEETS
Oct 2025
ASSET FINANCE
Nov 2025
Latest job alerts …
Dayton OH/Cincinnati OH, United States
Prospect CT, United States
Davenport, IA, United States
Philadelphia, United States
Upcoming industry events …
October 14-16, 2025 - Antwerp, Austria
October 15-17, 2025 - Bangkok, Thailand
November 17-19, 2026 - Luanda, Angola
Fact of the week
Brothers Adolf ("Adi") and Rudolf ("Rudi") Dassler split their shoe company after WWII due to a bitter feud, and established the rival companies of Adidas and Puma. Their personal animosity and business rivalry divided their German hometown Herzogenaurach. The town became known as "the town of bent necks" due to the intense loyalty to each brand.