Discussion:
replaced an ECU

Hi ALL
I am working on a Mitsubishi FD30NT F14E-33012.
The ECU got damaged and I changed it, now I am getting a fault code 73.Do I need the Mitsubishi software to rest the ECU or is there another way around it.
Thanks in advance for all the help.
  • Posted 4 Jan 2023 00:43
  • Modified 4 Jan 2023 00:44 by poster
  • By Paddyteclinde
  • joined 3 Dec'21 - 31 messages
  • Ireland
Showing items 1 - 1 of 1 results.
You will need truck tool to clear code 73 is mismatch in hours between vcm and display doesn't cause any problems just noticed you said ecu fd30 hasn't a ecu only a vcm brand new ones do but their common rail
  • Posted 7 Jan 2023 05:07
  • By alanmitsi
  • joined 8 Aug'13 - 151 messages
  • essex, United Kingdom

Post your Reply

Forkliftaction accepts no responsibility for forum content and requires forum participants to adhere to our rules of conduct. Click here for more information.

If you are having trouble using the Discussion Forums, please contact us for help.

Global Industry News
edition #1247 - 11 September 2025
In what may prove to be a sign of things to come, Canadian materials handling equipment lithium-ion battery manufacturer, UgoWork, has announced battery assembly for some forklifts bound for the North American domestic market will now be done in the US. See the story for full details... Continue reading
Fact of the week
At the opening ceremony of the Sydney Harbour Bridge in 1932, marching bands were instructed to walk out of step as they crossed the bridge. This unusual directive was given as a precaution due to concerns about the bridge's structural integrity during its early use.

PREMIUM business

F. Uchiyama
Global exporter of used forklift and construction machinery, servicing over 80 countries.

PREMIUM business

F. Uchiyama
Global exporter of used forklift and construction machinery, servicing over 80 countries.
Fact of the week
At the opening ceremony of the Sydney Harbour Bridge in 1932, marching bands were instructed to walk out of step as they crossed the bridge. This unusual directive was given as a precaution due to concerns about the bridge's structural integrity during its early use.