1. Home
  2. Forums
  3. News & Perspectives
  4. Liftall Clutch Slave Cylinder

Discussion:
Liftall Clutch Slave Cylinder

I am new to this forum.

I am working on a Liftall All Terrain Fork Lift, Model MT60G, SN BL6189. The clutch slave cylinder will not hold and the truck is unsafe as a result. I need a slave cylinder kit for this unit but can not find what I need from my local NAPA dealer.

Where can I find this part?

Thanks in advance,

Dean
  • Posted 21 Jul 2019 05:19
  • By deandysart
  • joined 21 Jul'19 - 2 messages
  • Utah, United States
Post a ReplyReport this post
Showing items 1 - 1 of 1 results.
OK, so I received zero replies here. I took the MC to a brake shop and they rebored the cylinder and inserted a sleeve and a new kit. All is good.
  • Posted 1 Aug 2019 21:31
  • By deandysart
  • joined 21 Jul'19 - 2 messages
  • Utah, United States
Post a ReplyReport this post

Post your Reply

Forkliftaction accepts no responsibility for forum content and requires forum participants to adhere to our rules of conduct. Click here for more information.

If you are having trouble using the Discussion Forums, please contact us for help.

Movers & Shakers
Andries Retief Andries Retief
Andries Retief
Chief development officer, DHL
Michael Simms
Director, ICHCA Australia
Dominiek Valcke
CEO, TVH
Chad Davis
Sales and operations director, Logitrans A/S
Global Industry News
edition #1247 - 11 September 2025
In what may prove to be a sign of things to come, Canadian materials handling equipment lithium-ion battery manufacturer, UgoWork, has announced battery assembly for some forklifts bound for the North American domestic market will now be done in the US. See the story for full details... Continue reading
Your Focus
Ellie Gabel
When warehouses go dark: protecting connected material handling operations from cyber threats
Ellie Gabel
Read blog
Read more Your Focus blog articles
Fact of the week
At the opening ceremony of the Sydney Harbour Bridge in 1932, marching bands were instructed to walk out of step as they crossed the bridge. This unusual directive was given as a precaution due to concerns about the bridge's structural integrity during its early use.