Report this forum post

I have, since 2004, asked the same question of OSHA, NIOSH, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the United States. Although the various government representatives assure me that stats do exist, they also assure me that they are to be found with a word search at the Bureau of Labor Statistics' web site. I assure you that NO USEFUL "Powered Industrial Truck-related training" STATISTICS EXIST AT ANY OF THESE AGENCIES. I would be delighted if someone...anyone... would prove me wrong in the matter!

I have only one source for useful information in regard to training-related forklift statistics. It is the proprietary National LIFTOR data base that has been investigating training interventions since 1985, on behalf of client subscribers. The National LIFTOR System relies fundamentally on the data that comes from our ongoing study. This data, gives us the basis for continuous improvement in the training-related interventions of LIFTOR.

For example, based upon our data, we have come to important conclusions such as:

1) Classroom based instruction is almost a total waste of time and may even increase, rather than decrease, the risk of injury among operators...no matter how high the quality of the instructor, the audio-visuals, or the in-classroom discussions, and

2) Pencil-and-paper (or computer-based) tests, quizzes, skill checks or assessments are typically and almost totally useless for inferring the skills of an operator. Further, pencil-and-paper tests are too superficial to have mush to do with actual on-job safety. Instead of pencil-and-paper tests, or the like, a content valid and reliable on-truck performance test (also known as a work sample. high-fidelity simulation, etc.) is most useful in predicting the incidence of serious injury, and can allow for accurate diagnosis of the operator's skill repertory. Conclusions like these have caused me to alter and improve the affects of my training and consultation on risk of serious operator injury.

And, yes, we actually follow our own data-based conclusions, even when some of them fly in the face of conventional training practices. I for one, have never regretted doing so, because I have seen the long-term affects on the productivity and safety of operators. Finally, I have also found that OSHA and NIOSH agree with the LIFTOR approach.

For a look at some of the early statistics and conclusions we shared with OSHA during the hearing on the latest OSHA rules on training, surf to OSHA DOT gov. Then, search docket #S-008. Then, look for Exhibit #7-60.

Best wishes,

Joe Monaco
President, Monaco Group, Inc.
www DOT LIFTOR DOT COM
  • Posted 15 Mar 2007 13:13
  • By joe_m
  • joined 14 Oct'05 - 68 messages
  • New Jersey, United States
www.LIFTOR.com
Operator/Examiner Certification for In-House Supervisors
jmonaco@LIFTOR.com

This is ONLY to be used to report flooding, spam, advertising and problematic (harassing, abusive or crude) posts.

Indicates mandatory field
Fact of the week
The word "okay" (or its abbreviation "OK") originated as a humorous misspelling. In the 1830s, a fad in Boston involved using abbreviations of intentionally misspelled phrases. "OK" stood for "oll korrect," a playful mispronunciation of "all correct".

PREMIUM business

MAXAM Tire, Inc.
Simplify your productivity with MAXAM's range of performance material handling tires, designed with the latest EcoPoint3 technology.
Fact of the week
The word "okay" (or its abbreviation "OK") originated as a humorous misspelling. In the 1830s, a fad in Boston involved using abbreviations of intentionally misspelled phrases. "OK" stood for "oll korrect," a playful mispronunciation of "all correct".
Upcoming industry events …
October 29-31, 2025 - Marina Bay Sands, Singapore
November 13-14, 2025 - Berlin, Germany
March 10-12, 2026 - Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Fact of the week
The word "okay" (or its abbreviation "OK") originated as a humorous misspelling. In the 1830s, a fad in Boston involved using abbreviations of intentionally misspelled phrases. "OK" stood for "oll korrect," a playful mispronunciation of "all correct".