Discussion:
Mitsubishi dropping Caterpillar name

Nothing at this time
  • Posted 2 Oct 2014 22:08
  • Modified 2 Oct 2014 22:08 by poster
  • Discussion started by chris_t
  • South Carolina, United States
Showing items 1 - 15 of 21 results.
How many of you work for an MCFA owned dealership? This topic has been an entertaining read and just goes to show how rumors can spread like a virus not matter how untrue they are.
  • Posted 6 Dec 2014 01:49
  • Reply by tomas_s
  • Bahamas, Bahamas, The
That's pretty funny...
Completely untrue and inaccurate, but funny nonetheless.
  • Posted 22 Nov 2014 22:36
  • Reply by AutoEV
  • Florida, United States
The % ownership of Caterpillar in the MCF (A, E, S) business is less than 20% these days. In 1992 it was 20% but has reduced over the years. The trademark is not paid for, but instead through it's share Caterpillar Inc make profit or loss every year dependent on turnover, and are obviously represented on the board of directors with 2 seats, from what I recall. The factory in China is not part of the MCF business directly which is why it's set up as Mitsubishi Forklift Dalian, and a different joint venture arrangement.

There is no issue between MCF/MHI and Caterpillar Inc., although Caterpillar are not really involved in the complete business, and really influence only brand implementation and use.

Many Cat Earth Moving dealers had already left the fold prior to 1992 due to the fact that Caterpillar was already loosing interest in the lift truck business and already for many years had farmed out its production and even the design responsibility to other parties i.e. Daewoo, Royal Tractor, Kalmar and Rocla. In the last years only a couple of models carried Cat engines, but no forklift was produced in house.
The lack of want or interest from Caterpillar in lift trucks has meant that there is really no desire from earth moving dealers to have Cat Lift Trucks as a product, except where they do not wish for someone else to offer Cat branded products. There is no synergy between the products at all, which is a shame as both sides would benefit.
It still does not make sense for MHI to end the relationship due to the power of the Cat brand.

Ed, didn't the 2b1c start only 6-8 years ago rather than over 10?
In the rest of the world this is still not something practiced, except in rare cases.
  • Posted 18 Nov 2014 19:15
  • Modified 18 Nov 2014 19:45 by poster
  • Reply by daniel_g
  • Flevoland, Netherlands
edT - How time flies, the MCFA, joint venture started June/July 1992.
  • Posted 12 Oct 2014 01:41
  • Reply by johnr_j
  • Georgia, United States
I would guess this discussion will come up about 1 or 2 years before each "end of contract" during the options negotiation phase, which I would guess to be on the 5 or 10 year anniversary of the joint venture, which I figure would be about now.
  • Posted 12 Oct 2014 01:03
  • Reply by edward_t
  • South Carolina, United States
"it's not rocket surgery"
@trainer

Please explain the big differnce between Caterpillar & CAT.

CAT is a registered brand name used by Caterpillar Inc. (the dirt side of Caterpillar). Caterpillar is a 20% owner of MCFA (a joint venture between MHI & Caterpillar Inc.)

The former Caterpillar lift truck company was a part of CII - Caterpillar Industrial Inc. - whose parent was Caterpillar Inc.
  • Posted 10 Oct 2014 02:08
  • Reply by johnr_j
  • Georgia, United States
you could paint a lime yellow and call it a lemon but it's still a lime ;o)
  • Posted 9 Oct 2014 21:59
  • Reply by swoop223
  • North Carolina, United States
You've been swooped!
swoop223@gmail.com
Thats the value of the cat name , how many people would buy a Mitsi truck. They are they same but yet people will pay a higher margin for the Cat.
  • Posted 9 Oct 2014 17:29
  • Reply by exalt
  • Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Guys, you are getting way over board here. I was just checking what I had heard. I don't need a class on what MCFA stands for or who owns what, I been around for about 40 years so I know,. I just heard the rumor coming from Houston and wondered if anyone else had. It makes no sense to take the Cat name away, even though everyone knows it is a Mitsi truck painted black and gold.
  • Posted 9 Oct 2014 07:33
  • Reply by chris_t
  • South Carolina, United States
MCFA is Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America
  • Posted 9 Oct 2014 07:24
  • Reply by Partsguy5
  • California, United States
What does the "C" stand for in MCFA?
CAT... not Catepillar

there is a BIG difference.......
  • Posted 9 Oct 2014 06:29
  • Reply by trainer
  • Indiana, United States
Just about everyone has seen this. It's nothing new, Cat Dirt and Cat Lift Trucks are completely separate.

I do not know about Cat Dirt not liking MCFA or any other high school type gossip. I do know MCFA is adding onto their production facility in Houston to manufacture more Caterpillar lift trucks. So, I doubt they drop the name. There is too much band value in the Caterpillar name.
I have been told, and seen that Caterpillar Heavy does not like nor have much to do with MCFA....

I have SEEN my own eyes CAT dirt dealers with Hyster's, Hoist's and Toyota's on their lots.... no MCFA's... hmmmmmmm

Phunny

Has anyone else seen this?
  • Posted 9 Oct 2014 06:04
  • Reply by trainer
  • Indiana, United States
yep edward, its funny how trademark liability can change a company.
Just follow the money trail ;o)
  • Posted 5 Oct 2014 03:06
  • Reply by swoop223
  • North Carolina, United States
You've been swooped!
swoop223@gmail.com

Post your Reply

Forkliftaction.com accepts no responsibility for forum content and requires forum participants to adhere to the rules. Click here for more information.

Having trouble using the Discussion Forums? Contact us for help.

Terberg YT182
Balling, Denmark
Used - Sale
Elwell-Parker ESI500-36
Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, United States
Used - Sale & Hire

PREMIUM business

Tailift Material Handling Taiwan Co.,Ltd.
Focused simply for the new era.
Latest job alerts …
Louisville, KY, United States
Dubuque, IA, United States
Louisville, KY, United States