Discussion:
Cat 35 no start

I have a cat 35 that won't start. I was changing the battery and the terminals touched backwards and then I didn't have any power anywhere after hooking them back up correctly. I figured the fusible link was toast so I checked it out and sure enough it was. I tried to put a jumper wire between the two plugs after removing the fusible link and I had a flash of light on the dash but now nothing again. I am going to start checking continuity on wires tomorrow as this lift was in a corrosive environment most of its life but I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on the subject
  • Posted 1 Dec 2020 17:16
  • By Aaron_C
  • joined 1 Dec'20 - 2 messages
  • North Carolina, United States
Aaron
Showing items 1 - 1 of 1 results.
Edit- it appears this is actually a gp 18 model
  • Posted 1 Dec 2020 17:21
  • By Aaron_C
  • joined 1 Dec'20 - 2 messages
  • North Carolina, United States
Aaron

Post your Reply

Forkliftaction accepts no responsibility for forum content and requires forum participants to adhere to our rules of conduct. Click here for more information.

If you are having trouble using the Discussion Forums, please contact us for help.

Terberg RT403
Balling, Denmark
Used - Sale
Toyota 8FGC35U-BCS
Flesherton, Ontario, Canada
Used - Sale

Showcased in the Virtual Expo

Upcoming in the editorial calendar
MANAGING MIXED FLEETS
Oct 2025
ASSET FINANCE
Nov 2025
Terberg RT403
Balling, Denmark
Used - Sale
Toyota 8FGC35U-BCS
Flesherton, Ontario, Canada
Used - Sale

Showcased in the Virtual Expo

Global Industry News
edition #1247 - 11 September 2025
In what may prove to be a sign of things to come, Canadian materials handling equipment lithium-ion battery manufacturer, UgoWork, has announced battery assembly for some forklifts bound for the North American domestic market will now be done in the US. See the story for full details... Continue reading
Fact of the week
At the opening ceremony of the Sydney Harbour Bridge in 1932, marching bands were instructed to walk out of step as they crossed the bridge. This unusual directive was given as a precaution due to concerns about the bridge's structural integrity during its early use.